"The prosecutor argued that he had no right to kill one dog to save another."
nutter alert |
hey, i thought Marx was charged for firing a weapon to protect mere PROPERTY?
me thinks the prosecutor has a nutter on staff and is exploiting loopholes to protect gripping dogs.
committing perjury |
committing perjury |
finding Marx not guilty was as easy peasy as owning a lab. the judge listened to Marx testimony and weighed it against the lies of HORNSBY and PARKER.
KAITLYNN HORNSBY said she and four others tried to get her mutant to release Marx's little dog. and KAITLYNN HORNSBY said that Marx didn't even give her a chance to get her mutant. i like watching that news snippet of these two idiots. PARKER sounds like a halfwit from the Appalachia and HORNSBY is obviously lying. watch her again. she starts to retell the event but when she comes to the self-incriminating part, she stops short and repeats herself and she touches her face.
and of course this whopper of a contradiction, "BRUSKI was just playing" and Marx's dog bit BRUSKI first."
i'm sure there were more lies. i bet the court transcripts are a hoot. i would have loved a front row seat. i wonder if SHANA KLEIN attended?
“At the time I think your actions were justified. It's hard to second guess the outcome of a dog fight.” ~Judge Bouchard
the judge gets it. they usually do.
cincinatti.com
ohio injustice
Good! I hope they had to pay all of the victims court costs.
ReplyDeleteColossal waste and abuse of taxpayer dollars prosecuting this man to advance making Nutters a protected class of dog owner.
ReplyDeleteKudos to the Judge for seeing through the humane smokescreen! The pit bull community has been about treating dogs like disposal pieces of meat since inception.
ps...Tens bucks says that if Marx hadn't shot this pit bull they would have Dine and Dashed on him!
The best part is that now a legal precedent has been set which can be used in future cases.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeletethe mutant was neutralized , the little dog saved and the stupid charges overturned . i guess it pays to be proactive and resolute when it comes to saving your attacked dog from fugly pitbulls .
It's difficult for me to read about good people being prosecuted for protecting their pets when the dumb ass pit bull owner doesn't do it.
ReplyDeleteI'm so satisfied the man was not charged for protecting his pet. I'm sure the pit owners perjured themselves in court and lied to the police. It's a pit bull owner thing.
The outcome of a pit bull attack on another dog is often death or mauling of humans.
ReplyDeleteNow it's time to sue the perps.
"Detached reflection cannot be demanded in the presence of an uplifted knife." -O.W. Holmes, Jr.
ReplyDeleteWill nutters ever accept that no one else needs to give a shit about their dogs when they attack?
I don't understand the mindset of any person who thinks this man did not have the right to protect his dog? He even tried non lethal methods of breaking up the fight first by using a stun gun. I can't understand these people that think he should have just let the attacking dog kill his. Pit bull owners must be narcissistic. They have no empathy for anyone but themselves and they can't take any responsibility. I just can't wrap my mind around it. I am very glad he was found not guilty.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeletewhat sort of person wants a dog that attacks other pets and does them grievous injury ? only such a person could not understand the rights of the other person to protect and save his pet . these pit ppl are not quite right in the head .
ReplyDeleteloved the dingbat committing perjury pic . its so obvious shes lying .
This is the best news I've heard in a long, long while.
ReplyDeleteSometimes the best justice system in the world gets it right!
ReplyDeletei wonder if the dingbats learned that allowing a mutant to attack could get it killed . a little bit of education you wont get on the pit sites , i imagine .
Just got The Pretender's reference!
ReplyDeleteConfessions of Pitbull Victims blogger often uses song lyrics, i thought i'd give it a try.
ReplyDelete