so much for blaming the deed and banning stupid owners

i think it is safe to say that those are empty slogans used for the sole purpose of diverting attention away from their frankenmaulers and escaping responsibility.

Madison County, Alabama: 74% of the voters said YES to a NON BREED SPECIFIC dangerous dog law. and guess who is against it? that's right... PIT NUTTERS! why? because even though it is not breed specific, they and their wiggle butts are the ones who will feel the greatest impact.

HB147 states

The Madison County Commission, by resolution applicable to those areas of Madison County outside the corporate limits of any municipality, may establish a procedure by which a dog can be declared dangerous, may impose civil penalties on the owner of a dog that inflicts severe personal harm on another person, and may require that dangerous dogs, as defined by the commission, be kept in a fenced enclosure, as defined by the commission, with input from the local humane society.

Section 2. An election upon the proposed amendment shall be held in accordance with Amendment 555 to the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, now appearing as Section 284.01 of the Official Recompilation of the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, as amended, and the election laws of this state.

Section 3. The appropriate election official shall assign a ballot number for the proposed constitutional amendment on the election ballot and shall set forth the following description of the substance or subject matter of the proposed constitutional amendment:

"Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, for those areas of Madison County outside the corporate limits of any municipality, to authorize the Madison County Commission, by resolution, to establish a procedure by which a dog can be declared dangerous, to impose civil penalties on the owner of a dog that inflicts severe personal harm on another person, and to require that dangerous dogs be kept in a fenced enclosure with input from the local humane society.

nowhere in this amendment does it single out the pit bull or rottweiler or wolf hybrid. hard to imagine WHY people who squeal about blaming deeds and banning stupid owners and media bias would not welcome this into law. i think their opposition PROVES that the media isn't biased and the pit bull owners are trying to protect themselves.

let's take a closer look at the nutters who are opposed to holding dog owners responsible for the damage that their dogs inflict on others and forcing them to keep said dogs enclosed in a fence.

WHNT reported on this in late october. they went to a DOG PARK and interviewed PETER and KATHY.

is that a wiggle butt?

PETER LARIVIERE "Anybody who is a pet owner should be concerned."

anybody? you mean like dachshund, poodle and collie owners? yeah, they are all up in arms about it. oh, no wait, they are too busy still trying to find the fucktards who left them with a mangled heap of blood and fur on the sidewalk.

KATHY MATRAS "When you are going in there to vote and you don't have all the information ahead of time, it's an extremely awkward situation. If they want you to cast a ballot and cast it intelligently, they should give you enough information to make an educated decision."

all of the information is there. it need not be made more difficult by nutter lawyers from new york and utah. if your dog bites, you will be held responsible. it is as simple as that.

WAFF

JESSICA CABLER "My dogs are really sweet, really goofy, really fun. They are all perfect with people, perfect with other animals."

obviously JESSICA has nothing to worry about, it's THOSE pit bull owners who RAISE them wrong. (that was sarcasm) she should be embracing this law but instead she is whipping up a fear frenzy saying it "might snowball into a breed ban" and that would put her "pit rescue out of business". isn't the REAL goal behind a RESCUE to no longer be needed? don't you want to reach a point where every dog has a home? and the pit nutters call us fear mongers!

i saved the absolute best for last.

WAAYTV

BRYNN ANDERSON "Since it's so vague, it's got us nervous. I am not angry and I do believe irresponsible dog owners need to be held responsible, but it bothers me. I worry about my dogs future."

it is VAGUE because it is NOT breed specific! it bothers her because she knows that the media is NOT biased and that even "responsible" pit bull owners can't safely guarantee containment of their mutants. i would love to see what kind of an ordinance these nutters would write.

watch BRYNN entertaining the news media in her home. her dogs are out of control and LEASHED inside her home! as one of the news crew members reaches out to pet one of her mutants, it tries to say "hello" with its teeth. outside, her dog is pulling so hard on its leash, that it is walking upright. that's NOT what you want to see coming toward you when walking your poodle!

BRYNN ANDERSON is the vice president of the alabama bulldogger association. you will find a lot of "cool" people at their events, like FLOYD B and this little one. she is in cool training.

cool junior will be getting her first tat after the show.