new zealand shane anderson is upset that animal control returned the pit bull to its owner after it attacked his flock. eight of his lambs were injured, three had to be shot. the reasoning behind returning the dog: THE DOG POSED A MINIMUM RISK OF ATTACKING AGAIN BECAUSE IT LIVED ON A FENCED PROPERTY. what kind of logic is this? anderson wants the dog killed, like any sane responsible person. and the owner of the dog? pit nutter JILLIAN TAYLOR said the dog is a 10 yr old family pet. "it's not a vicious dog, it's not a vicious attack." "it's an unfortunate accident" and anderson just wants to make "a big drama" out of it.
you can't make this shit up!
the owner of the pit bull who killed a yorkie will be charged. ROGER E. EMERICK SR. of boswell, pennsylvania will face unspecified charges. the frankenmauler named SUGAR, must remain in a locked pen until its fate has been decided by a judge.
when asked about the inherent violence of pit bulls, dog law supervisor HAROLD WALSTROM who worked with the state patrol to locate the pit nutter and his frankenmauler, responded, "Dogs, like people, need to be judged individually. A Chihuahua could be more of a threat than a pit bull."
really, more of a threat than a pit bull? to who, a horse? a lamb? an 80 yr old man? a 40 yr old woman? a 12 yr old boy? this dog?
see also out of the pit and into the street